What-If Simulator

Causal intervention modelling ยท DoubleML CATE ยท results update instantly

โ†’

No scenario โ€” adjust sliders to begin

Adjust the sliders to model the causal impact of pricing, marketing, headcount, and rate changes on revenue, margin, and cash.

2026-09-19

Intervention Levers

Price Change

Average selling price delta across all SKUs

0%
-15%Reset15%

Marketing Spend

Change in quarterly marketing budget

0%
-50%Reset100%

Headcount

Workforce size change (+ = hire, โˆ’ = reduce)

0%
-20%Reset20%

BoC Rate Shock

Basis points change to overnight rate

0bps
-100bpsReset300bps

Baseline vs Scenario

Scenario Revenue

$4.22M

โ†‘ +0.0% vs base

Base: $4.22M

Gross Margin

34.2%

โ†‘ +0.0pp vs base

Base: 34.2%

EBITDA

$1.06M

โ†’ $-0.12M

Base: $1.18M

Debt Service

$380K

โ†‘ +$0K vs base

Base: $380K / quarter

Cash Position

$6.97M

โ†‘ +$0.00M

Base: $6.97M

Scenario Comparison

Baseline ยท Current Scenario ยท Stress (Combined)

MetricBaselineScenarioStress (โˆ’20% rev)
Quarterly Revenue$4.22M$4.22M$3.38M
Gross Margin34.2%34.2%31.0%
EBITDA$1.18M$1.06M$0.65M
Debt Service / Qtr$380K$380K$475K
Cash (end Qtr)$6.97M$6.97M$5.57M
DSCR0.78ร—0.70ร—1.09ร—

Revenue Impact Decomposition

Revenue Bridge โ€” Baseline to Scenario

Contribution of each lever ยท $M quarterly

Sensitivity Tornado

Revenue impact of each lever at max setting ยท $M swing

Price is the highest-leverage lever. Marketing shows diminishing returns above +30%.

Causal deltas estimated via DoubleML Partially Linear Regression (PLR). Treatment variables: price delta %, marketing spend delta %, headcount delta %, BoC rate bps. Outcome: quarterly revenue and gross margin. Confounders: macro cycle phase, seasonality index, customer concentration. CATE coefficients pre-computed โ€” ONNX worker wires in live inference in Session 12.